AIM: To describe the self-reported mental health of nurses from 35 countries who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BACKGROUND: There is little occupationally specific data about nurses’ mental health worldwide. Studies have documented the impact on nurses’ mental health of the COVID-19 pandemic, but few have baseline referents.
METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional design structured the study. Data reflect a convenience sample of 9,387 participants who completed the opt-in survey between July 31, 2022, and October 31, 2023. Descriptive statistics were run to analyze the following variables associated with mental health: Self-reports of mental health symptoms, burnout, personal losses during the pandemic, access to mental health services, and self-care practices used to cope with pandemic-related stressors. Reporting of this study was steered by the STROBE guideline for quantitative studies.
RESULTS: Anxiety or depression occurred at rates ranging from 23%–61%, with country-specific trends in reporting observed. Approximately 18% of the sample reported experiencing some symptoms of burnout. The majority of nurses’ employers did not provide mental health support in the workplace. Most reported more frequently engaging with self-care practices compared with before the pandemic. Notably, 20% of nurses suffered the loss of a family member, 35% lost a friend, and 34% a coworker due to COVID-19. Nearly half (48%) reported experiencing public aggression due to their identity as a nurse.
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained establish a basis for understanding the specific mental health needs of the nursing workforce globally, highlighting key areas for service development.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY: Healthcare organizations and governmental bodies need to develop targeted mental health support programs that are readily accessible to nurses to foster a resilient nursing workforce.
A descriptive analysis of nurses’ self-reported mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international study
International Nursing Review, 72 (1), e13099. doi: 10.1111/inr.13099.